Comments on: Comparing Continuous Integration Tools, Part 1 http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/ Matthew D. Laudato writes about software and technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:03:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: golbie http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-2944 Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:38:44 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-2944 hi matt,

very good article! I’m going to compare Bamboo with TeamCity. I’m actually running Apache Continuum but this software seems not to be maintained anymore. There isn’t support for any other build type (rake, .net,…), either. So I installed JetBrains TeamCity and I’m very impressed by the features (we are already running other development tools from JetBrains: PHPStorm and RubyMine).

Do you think it’s worth to install JIRA’s Bamboo? We’re using JIRA for Issue Management. Would you recommend Bamboo in this case?

The current Version of Bamboo is 5.X
The current version of Teamcity is 7.0.X. I found some interesting stuff here: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2012/04/24/ (scroll to the paragraph “build chain visibility”).

thx
golbie

]]> By: Matthew D. Laudato http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-1005 Fri, 06 May 2011 18:42:00 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-1005 Good point on the dating of the article. As you might have guessed, other obligations (like new jobs) have derailled my plan to do part 2. Expect to see me post on other topics of general tech interest – including web services, APIs and integrations.

- Matt

]]> By: Charles Roth http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-706 Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:34:56 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-706 Good article. Where’s part 2?

I highly recommend dating articles. 10 years from now this link may be still around, and may either be totally irrelevant, or very useful. W/o a date, one can’t even guess. Metadata, metadata!

]]> By: Matthew D. Laudato http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-223 Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:48:28 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-223 Tom – my focus was on products that are readily available for trials, rather than on products that require interaction with a company sales force to trial. AHP is certainly an important product in the CI market.

]]> By: Tom Canova http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-210 Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:29:06 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-210 I’m curious about the products included/excluded from the comparison group. Would you consider Hudson, Bamboo and TeamCity to be technical leaders who you wanted to measure up against? Would the lack of a product in this list , such as Anthill Pro, therefore indicate that you did not view it to be in the top 3 leaders.

]]> By: Comparing Continuous Integration Tools, Part 1 http://technistas.com/2010/06/07/comparing-continuous-integration-tools-part-1/#comment-197 Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:21:45 +0000 http://technistas.com/?p=151#comment-197 [...]  Check out the full results on technistas.com. [...]

]]>